J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsuki, S
Right arrow Articles by Nakano, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsuki, S
Right arrow Articles by Nakano, S

Articles

Pharmacokinetic changes of theophylline and amikacin through the menstrual cycle in healthy women

S Matsuki, T Kotegawa, K Tsutsumi, K Nakamura, and S Nakano

The objective of this open-label, single-dose study was to clarify the influence of the menstrual cycle on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline (n = 10) and amikacin (n = 8) in young healthy Japanese women with regular menstrual cycles. Each subject received an intravenous infusion of theophylline or amikacin sulfate at four different phases--mid-follicular (phase I), peri-ovulatory (phase II), mid-luteal (phase III), and premenstrual days (phase IV). In the theophylline study, there were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters among the four phases studied. In the amikacin study, CLtot was 15% higher in phase III than in phase I (p < 0.01). Vd beta was 35% higher in phase III than in phase I (p < 0.05). The other pharmacokinetic parameters of amikacin were not significantly altered during the menstrual cycle. Evidence suggests that the phase of the menstrual cycle may be a factor in determining the pharmacokinetics of amikacin.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
K. Bachmann, D. White, L. Jauregui, J. I. Schwartz, N. G. B. Agrawal, R. Mazenko, P. J. Larson, and A. G. Porras
An Evaluation of the Dose-Dependent Inhibition of CYP1A2 by Rofecoxib Using Theophylline as a CYP1A2 Probe
J. Clin. Pharmacol., October 1, 2003; 43(10): 1082 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology